<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moodle development traffic 11/2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-development-traffic-112010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-development-traffic-112010/</link>
	<description>Moodle, Mahara and beer fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olli Savolainen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-development-traffic-112010/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Olli Savolainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mudrak.name/?p=203#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Great to hear about work on wall functionality! Seems to me though that adding editing to the equation would make it a confusing cross breed of a document editor and ... well, a wall/light forum (a.k.a the sad story of google wave). 

Facebook&#039;s solution of making wall posts immutable but deletable (and thus repostable) seems to simplify the concept a lot. It makes it clear to others than the author that a really necessary change was made - I perceive the usage scenario of a wall post as not &quot;creating  a [more or less official] document that needs to be error free&quot; but a free form of quick communication, closely related to micro blogging. 

Adding approval functionality takes the concept closer to blog comments or even legacy guestbooks - I guess it might be required in a setting where teachers want to control things, but still makes me wonder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear about work on wall functionality! Seems to me though that adding editing to the equation would make it a confusing cross breed of a document editor and &#8230; well, a wall/light forum (a.k.a the sad story of google wave). </p>
<p>Facebook&#8217;s solution of making wall posts immutable but deletable (and thus repostable) seems to simplify the concept a lot. It makes it clear to others than the author that a really necessary change was made &#8211; I perceive the usage scenario of a wall post as not &#8220;creating  a [more or less official] document that needs to be error free&#8221; but a free form of quick communication, closely related to micro blogging. </p>
<p>Adding approval functionality takes the concept closer to blog comments or even legacy guestbooks &#8211; I guess it might be required in a setting where teachers want to control things, but still makes me wonder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudrd8mz</title>
		<link>http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-development-traffic-112010/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>mudrd8mz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mudrak.name/?p=203#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[New Post] Moodle development traffic 11/2010 - via @twitoaster http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[New Post] Moodle development traffic 11/2010 &#8211; via @twitoaster <a href="http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-d.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.mudrak.name/2010/03/moodle-d..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

